Banksy's statement, "Graffiti is a Crime," carries dual meaning. one hand, highlights legal repercussions with graffiti as act vandalism trespassing.
"When street artists it, it's vandalism," one graffiti writer. "When Banksy it, it's art piece. There's disconnect there."
We that Banksy street mural be worth of £400,000 it likely Banksy is of few graffiti artists unsolicited works not subject criminal .
So Banksy, came a leafier part town, decided go his foray there, was nervous. "My dad badly beaten there a kid," told fellow graffiti artist .
Of course, main catalyst graffiti making news - in UK, least - when Banksy's decided needs alert world something, Palestine consumerism.
Banksy lurks the shadows, the klieg lights the celebrity he's generated. . "Graffiti is a crime. spoils environment, our neighborhoods feel safe, costs .
Though can assume graffiti amounts criminal damage, graffiti artistic merit monetary worth instead enhance value that property. much that homeowners had Banksy the side their home offered mural sale 2007 "with Victorian house attached". Valentine's Day mural
A response an interstitial practice comes a 'yes, but' form: graffiti is crime, art — it always something (ibid.). . Edwards, I. (2009). Banksy's graffiti: a not-so-simple case criminal damage. Journal Criminal Law, 73(4), 345-361. Article Google Scholar Ferrell, J. (2009). Hiding the light .
Graffiti artists are, caught, likely be prosecuted s. 1 the Criminal Damage Act 1971. . Banksy's Graffiti: A Not-So-Simple Case Criminal Damage? Ian Edwards [email protected] View authors affiliations. . Crime, Media, Culture. Nov 2015. Restricted access. Criminal images: affective judgment graffiti .
It argued the work artists as Banksy forces reappraisal the precision applicability criminal damage. AB - Graffiti artists are, caught, likely be prosecuted s. 1 the Criminal Damage Act 1971. article explores extent which substantive definition criminal damage applies them.
